AuditMySite vs Conductor:self-serve audit + auto-fixvs enterprise SEO platform with annual contracts.
Conductor is enterprise SEO and content workflow software. AuditMySite gives you the technical audit and execution layer without sales calls, custom contracts, or onboarding consultants.
Why teams switch from Conductor
Three reasons AuditMySite wins for site audits.
90-second self-serve vs 6-week onboarding
Conductor onboarding includes training sessions, account configuration, and customer success kickoff. AuditMySite is self-serve from minute one — drop your URL, see the audit immediately.
90s
vs 4–6 weeks of onboarding
Auto-fix vs workflow recommendations
Conductor surfaces issues and routes them through content workflow tools. The fix still requires manual implementation by content or dev teams. AuditMySite ships the fix automatically through CMS, CDN, or GitHub PR.
Auto
fixes deployed without workflow tooling
£29 vs £35,000+ annual contract
Conductor enterprise contracts typically start at £35,000+ per year. AuditMySite is £29 one-time or £149/month for 25-client agency coverage. Different orders of magnitude for the technical audit layer.
£29
vs £35k+ annual contract
Feature comparison
AuditMySite vs Conductor feature by feature.
| Feature | AuditMySite £29 once or £49/mo | Conductor £35k+/yr enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Self-serve signup | ✓ | — |
| Annual contract required | — | ✓ |
| Auto-fix execution | ✓ | — |
| AI Overviews citation tracking | ✓ | Limited |
| Schema JSON-LD generation | ✓ | Manual |
| Content workflow tooling | — | ✓ |
| Customer success manager | — | ✓ |
| GitHub PR generation | ✓ | — |
| Onboarding time | 90 seconds | 4–6 weeks |
| Per-domain pricing | Unlimited URLs | ✓ |
Test it yourself
Drop your URL. See the difference in 90 seconds.
Run a free audit. Compare what AuditMySite finds against the report you'd get from Conductor.
Skip the comparison
Deep-dive audit + auto-fix queue.
£29 ships every fix automatically — schema, meta data, image compression — to your CMS, CDN, or GitHub. No developer needed for most changes.
No subscription. 14-day money-back. Cancel instantly.
FAQ
AuditMySite vs Conductor, answered.
Is AuditMySite a Conductor alternative?
For the technical audit and execution layer: yes — AuditMySite ships fixes that Conductor routes through workflows. For enterprise content collaboration and stakeholder dashboards: Conductor remains stronger. Many teams use AuditMySite for execution and a lighter content collaboration tool instead of Conductor.
Does Conductor auto-fix issues?
No. Conductor identifies issues and creates content workflow tasks for marketing or developer teams to implement. AuditMySite ships the fix itself — schema, meta data, alt text, redirects — without requiring a workflow tool or manual implementation.
What does Conductor do better than AuditMySite?
Enterprise content workflow tooling, stakeholder reporting dashboards, customer success management, and integration with internal content production processes. Conductor is built for large enterprise SEO operations. AuditMySite is built for technical execution without enterprise overhead.
What's the price difference?
Conductor enterprise: typically £35,000+ per year on annual contract. AuditMySite: £29 once for full audit + auto-fix queue, £49/month for continuous monitoring, or £149/month for an agency plan covering 25 client sites. The cost difference is 200–1000× for the technical audit layer.
Can mid-market companies use AuditMySite instead of Conductor?
Yes — most mid-market companies that buy Conductor end up using 20% of the platform. AuditMySite covers the technical SEO and AI visibility layer at a fraction of the cost. Pair it with a lighter content collaboration tool (Notion, Asana, ClickUp) for the workflow piece.
Compared by teams in Conductor
Industries where these teams find the right tool for their industry.
Stop guessing. Start scoring.
Run your free audit. See exactly what's broken. Approve the fixes. Watch the score climb. No card. No call. No 'enterprise contact us'.